Would Vince Lombardi make a good Construction Manager?

Home/Situational Ethics/Would Vince Lombardi make a good Construction Manager?

Would Vince Lombardi make a good Construction Manager?

Would Vince Lombardi make a good Construction Manager?

Working with attorneys, general contractors and owners throughout the world, construction expert Paul Gogulski learned the ins and outs  of Vince Lombardi’s famous  rule: “Winning isn’t everything; it’s the only thing.”  It has been said that this well-known quotation regarding winning encapsulates what is purportedly wrong with competitive sports.  It is Mr. Gogulski’s opinion that the same holds true for the claims process in the construction industry.

Vince Lombardi teaching “What I’ve learned is a dilemma exists between those who believe in the Lombardi rule and those who feel that intellectual integrity should prevail,” Mr. Gogulski said.

 For example, a subcontractor on the Venetian Casino Resort in Las Vegas was awarded a contract for $3 million during construction. Mr. Gogulski was hired when the subcontractor’s cost was $8 million and the project was 75% complete. By attending foremen meetings, observing field conditions, examining records, and talking to management, Paul found the subcontractor had badly underbid this design-build contract.  He also found excessive errors and inefficiencies in the subcontractor’s daily field management.   While damages occurred that was attributable to the Owner and the Construction Manager, the subcontractor’s claim omitted significant facts relating to their own operations.  Final cost was four times the subcontractor’s original bid. To go forward with these figures in developing a claim without a significant credit for the error in the estimate as well as for the subcontractors failing to perform is unethical in Mr. Gogulski’s opinion.  Those who believe in Vince Lombardi’s rule will disagree.

In addition, the same subcontractor put the public at risk by failing to follow Mr. Gogulski’s recommendations during a critical changeover of electric service when the building was partially occupied.

“Once situational ethics prevails over intellectual integrity, a line is crossed which is easy to justify  in a culture where winning is the only thing” Mr. Gogulski  said. “I have witnessed this same occurrence on other cases.”

If you concur that the construction industry is better served by intellectual integrity, then Mr. Gogulski would appreciate hearing from you.  His firm has developed unique ways to reduce the cost of claims, and eliminate abuse from “situational ethics.” 


Photo Credit: Soccer Fit Academy

Post by Paul Gogulski

Connect with Paul on LinkedIn


By | 2012-12-17T19:06:42+00:00 December 17th, 2012|Situational Ethics|0 Comments

About the Author:

Leave A Comment